Showing posts with label Naked. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Naked. Show all posts

Jun 22, 2012

I think Manohla Dargis was the first

To suggest the idea of the brill Mike Leigh double feature of Naked and Happy-Go-Lucky.  They are opposite sides of the same coin, and also reflect a male (Naked:  bleak, violent, cynical, cerebral, fucked-up outlook) vs the female (Happy-Go-Lucky:  upbeat, optimistic, nurturing, empathetic, right brain outlook.)  I do not think Leigh wanted to make an "answer" film, per se, to Naked.  Leigh is one of the finest artists in cinema today and does not cater, ever, to public demand of that sort.  He is crazy dedicated to telling his stories, whatever they may be, exactly and perfectly in the manner he wants the story told.



Naked is a difficult film, for sure, plus it is long.  But I was so caught up in its Odyssean like sweep that I saw it at least four or five times in the theater when it was released, most of the time by myself.  (Hey, kids, I saw it at the old art-house in downtown Berkeley right by the campus. The theater does not exist anymore.) It is the performances in this film, notably David Thewlis, who won best actor at Cannes that year, that hook you in to Naked.  Thewlis delivers an absolutely stunning wracked version of Johnny that probably left him a husk of his normal self and messed him up personally for a short while.  But then we also get Lesley Sharp, Ewan Bremner, Katrin Cartlidge (RIP, sister.  Such a talent, and she died so young), Claire Skinner, Peter Wight, Gina McKee, etc, ... all of them expertly creating the universe that Thatcher's No Culture version of Britain will ultimately become.  Of course, the "sexy" part of Naked is Johnny's numerous monologues on the state of the universe, which are alternately despairing and hilarious.  There is certainly nothing sexy about the actual sex in the film, of which there is a fair amount.  That is brutal and joyless every single time.  Probably because of that, Naked is a Bridge Too Far for Renee.  She does not like Naked, and I do not think she has seen the film all the way through.

But, Happy-Go-Lucky, on the other hand, we saw in the theater together, and we own on dvd, and is one of our all-time favorite films.  "Enraha!" was/is an absolute secret language inside joke with us, still.  The "Johnny" character in Happy-Go-Lucky this time is, if not vanquished, at least abated, and done so with a firm yet empathetic touch of Poppy's hand.  Poppy is a single woman in her thirties who lives quite happily with her other single flatmate, both of them Primary School teachers.  Poppy, played by the striking lovely Sally Hawkins, is one of my ultimate heroes of cinema.  Whenever life is crushing me, and the dark cynical side of me bubbles towards the surface, I literally try to imagine how Poppy would handle the situation.  Ms Hawkins may never give a performance this good again in a motion picture.  It is her Party Piece, her Calling Card, just as David Thewlis has never done anything nearly as good as Johnny in Naked, either.  The entire community of Happy-Go-Lucky inhabit the opposite universe as those of Naked.  They are a community that is always looking to work together, without passing judgement, to make the world a better place. Plus, the sex scene in Happy-Go-Lucky is sweet, touching, playful and lovely.  It is a profound, joyful, exquisite work of cinema art that Renee and I (and many others) will always treasure.

By the way, one of my two favorite DPs shot both of these films, in completely different styles and palettes, Dick Pope.  Stellar work.

So, I would watch Naked first, I think.  End on a high note, right?

(Have fun, Justin.)













And, please please please, could we finally get a US dvd/blu-ray release of Mike Leigh's Life Is Sweet, already? Jeez, ...














All my love,
Poppy

Nov 5, 2011

Since the World Serious ended

I have thrown myself in to film.  Luckily, I am on a major winning streak.  Because nearly everything I have picked (from my couch in lovely Walnut Creek) has been v good.

I bought Page Eight, Tabloid (I have already seen it), Beginners, Rosemary's Baby (Halloween, natch), 28 Days Later (Halloween, already seen it), and dvr'd Catfish, Some Like It Hot (already seen it, one of my all-time faves), and La Fille Coupee en Deux.

Beginners, Tabloid, and 28 Days Later have all been discussed in this space, already, but I might have some stray notes at the end re these films and Le Nom des Gens, as well.

************

Believe it or not but I had never seen Rosemary's Baby until four days ago.  I am not quite sure why.  I like the Horror genre, even if I am not passionate about it, per se.  And I am a huge fan of Roman Polanski, particularly Repulsion, Chinatown, Knife in the Water, The Tenant, etc, ... But, for whatever reason, this one had escaped my attention.  The wife and I had company over for dinner on Halloween and watched "scary" movies, and Renee wanted to watch this.

My favorite scene in the entire film was a simple, static shot from Mia Farrow's point of view, staring in to the living room, seeing nothing but pipe smoke fill the space from right to left on the screen.  I liked the v first dream/nightmare sequence, too.  And I naturally loved the whole idea that the story is set in motion because a struggling actor (Farrow's husband, John Cassavetes) wants to make it big on Broadway.

Still, despite great pacing; great shots; and some great performances from Elisha Cook Jr, Sydney Blackmer, Ruth Gordon, Ralph Bellamy, and  Charles Grodin (!); the film seemed woefully dated to me.  I will stick with the black and white, Swinging London, Repulsion, thank you v much, which is still provocative and shocking today.

But, do not ever forget that a year after Rosemary's Baby, another monstrous "Family" would brutally murder Polanski's wife and child in Hollywood.  Bizarre and awful.  The sweep of Polanski's tragic, insane life deserves an epic novel.  I do not know who would be sensitive enough to write it, though.

************

Page Eight, written and directed by the stellar playwright, David Hare, has a top shelf cast, sublime dialogue, and perfect dramatic structure (of course.)

"Spud.  Casual sex, Spud."
Here is your top shelf cast:  Bill Nighy, Michael Gambon, Rachel Weisz, Judy Davis, Ewen Bremner, Ralph Fiennes, and Tom Hughes, just to get you started.

The film is not groundbreaking or profound or seminal in any way.  It is just a solid dramatic entertainment, full of memorable scenes, and a positive ethical/moral message.

The best scenes, with the best dialogue, are reserved for Nighy and Ms Weisz (who is extremely fetching, wearing all black throughout the entire picture, yet never once showing us her legs), particularly the "meet cute" and the few scenes they have right after that.

My favorite lines are, "As mean at cat meat." and "I'm (You're?) living in injury time."

Page Eight is good stuff, and will be on Masterpiece Contemporary on PBS this Sunday.

************

You know, I do not care if Catfish is a hoax.  More power to the film makers, then, if it is.  I am biting at that hook, anyway.  There are some genuinely scary moments in the film and the way the "stars" of this (ostensibly a documentary) film handle the situation in such a loving, sensitive way is v touching to me.

I am fine with being conned if it produces this kind of empathy and warmth.

The trailer and the marketing for the film are a whole different issue, though.  I would like to believe the film makers had little or nothing to do with that.

************

Ludivine Sagnier (what a preposterously gorgeous name) is a v fine actor.  I have seen her in two films now, Love Crime (where she is v good, indeed) and La Fille Coupee en Deux.  She is not pretty, really.  She can sometimes be v sexy, especially in her walk, and she most certainly looks better in jeans than she does in skirts or dresses.  (There is nothing wrong with her legs, that is just the way she is.)  She reminds me of Chloe Sevigny (another blonde with a similar French name), though Ms Sevigny, while attractive, is definitely more masculine in her appearance than Ms Sagnier.  Ms Sagnier is a better actor, as well.

The magician has his work cut out for him.
La Fille Coupee en Deux is one of the last films the French nouvelle vague Master, Claude Chabrol made.  And it is not at all unlike any of his other forty (or fifty) or so films.  Still, it is a pleasure to watch.

Chabrol loved Hitchcock and made many many many thrillers.  But Chabrol's thrillers, like this one, were not quite the same thing.  My favorite Chabrol film, Les Bonnes Femmes, barely gives the viewer even the slightest hint of what the climax ultimately becomes.  Which is something Hitch would absolutely abhor and is antithetical to Hitch's entire film making aesthetic (even if he might have enjoyed the film, personally.)  There are certainly more hints in 2007 with La Fille than in 1960 with Les Bonnes Femmes.

What is also remarkable about Chabrol's films is that so many of them are stories about women, and that if you just heard their story lines, without ever seeing any of them, you would think they are blatantly misogynistic.  But seeing the films, you do not get that feeling, at all.  Chabrol's work reminds me of the furore surrounding Mike Leigh's near-Masterpiece, Naked, suggesting quite loudly that the film was an attack on women.  How absurd! Naked is a proto-apocalyptic millennial  critique of Thatcher and the right-wing's destructive influence on men.  It is a hyper-active reflection of Susan Faludi's excellent book, Stiffed.

La Fille is quite funny, as well.  And its' suggestion that the author might be more twisted than the playboy is so skillfully handled, and with such grace and wit, that you understand exactly Ms Sagnier's plight, and probably agree with her decisions.

Or, maybe, you do not.  What is it about French directors, who seem to have such a talent for expressing ambiguity and objectivity?

"Everyone has their reasons."

It is a lesson American artists could do well to pay intense attention to.

************

Some stray notes:

I did not mention earlier how much Mills' work in Beginners reminded me in tone, and editing, and "tricks", of Wes Anderson's work.  Which is funny, 'cause Godblesshim, Anderson is one of the most derivative film makers working today.  (And I am a massive fan of Anderson's films, especially the first two.)

And speaking of derivative, Le Nom des Gens has a lovely original score but it also contains a crucial piece of music that sounds near just about like a Neil Innes song for the Rutles, Another Day.  Which is hilarious because Another Day is a pastiche of the Beatles' song, Martha My Dear.

Love you all, mwah, ...