Mar 10, 2011
Mar 9, 2011
This is a post,
Strictly, pretty much for my Food Hole friend-ies:
I forgot to mention in my Tre Biccheiri post that I bumped in to David Gish there. He got my name wrong, of course, and still thought I was cutting cheese. (To non Foodholies, That is not a joke.) He was w/ a gray haired older man. Gish was plumper in the face but kept the same frame and he was still wearing clogs.
The next thing of note is for the lovely Zann: Sammy, the crazy deaf guy w/ a dog; he shops at my Walnut Creek store now! And he is still a pain in the arse.
I forgot to mention in my Tre Biccheiri post that I bumped in to David Gish there. He got my name wrong, of course, and still thought I was cutting cheese. (To non Foodholies, That is not a joke.) He was w/ a gray haired older man. Gish was plumper in the face but kept the same frame and he was still wearing clogs.
The next thing of note is for the lovely Zann: Sammy, the crazy deaf guy w/ a dog; he shops at my Walnut Creek store now! And he is still a pain in the arse.
It is a massive generalization,
I know, but it is one I like to use anyhow: Women are from Burgundy. Men are from Bordeaux. Women prefer Pinot Noir, Chardonnay, Barolo. Men prefer Cabernet, Sauvignon Blanc, Sangiovese. Like I said it is a massive generalization and it ain't perfect by any stretch. The biggest flaw to me being that many women love Merlot, a Bordeaux variety.
But I am sticking with it regardless.
My sweetie loves Pinot Noir. It is her favorite red variety. I would much rather have Cab, Merlot or a Bordeaux blend. She loves sparkling wine, and I do, too, but I have no palate for it. She is much better at expressing what she is tasting than I am when it comes to bubbles.
My problem with Pinot Noir is that for the most part I only really like Burgundies. And then the problem with that problem is that it is hard to find really good red Burgundy for under twenty dollars. The "budget" Burgundies that I like the most start at around twenty-five dollars retail. Meanwhile, it is very easy to find rocking bordeaux-style blends, or Bordeaux itself, or regular Cali Cab and Merlot at around twelve dollars and up.
With the exception of Kent Rasmussen's Ramsay North Coast Pinot Noir ($16-17) I have yet to find a reliable vintage in and vintage out under twenty dollar California Pinot Noir.
And then there is the other problem: California Pinot Noir at the over twenty dollar range is invariably way too hot and way way way too over-oaked, tasting burnt.
My customers love LaCrema ($19) but I cannot stand it. All you taste is barrel. There is no fruit, at all.
No wonder I am always bringing home Cab and Merlot or blends of the same. (I love Chinon and Cabernet Franc, too. Renee likes the York Creek Spring Mountain Cuvee One ($16, a Cab Franc/Cabernet blend. York Creek is one of my mostest favoritist wineries. It is Fritz Maytag's winery. He is the guy who saved Anchor Brewing and made it in to one of the best breweries in America whilst the rest of his Maytag family are either making appliances or the fab Maytag blue cheese.) But if I bring home Chinon she frowns, too vegetal.
So, it was wonderful to see her bring home more Radio Coteau last night, a 2007! It was a wonderful present. Thanks, sweetie! It was gone rather too quickly (but we have a 2008, warming up in the bullpen.) I have discussed Radio Coteau in this space before but let me remind you that although not really Burgundian in style (frick, everyone here in Cali claims that they are Burgundian in style and none of them are. They do not have the soil, damnitt. Ugh.) Radio Coteau is one of the finest Cali Pinot Noirs evah!
Guess how much it costs? Fifty frickin dollars! (and worth every penny, honestly, it is a magical wine) and the one we've been drinking, the Nebblina, is Radio Coteau's entry-level wine!
That is what it is like drinking Pinot Noir in California. Ugh. Get me a glass of Stephen Vincent Merlot, please ($11.)
Of course if you live in France it is a whole different story. Those amazing Burgundies are dirt cheap there.
(Even accounting for the dock strikes. I love France. All of the US, waiting patiently for the 2010 Roses to sell. They are all on hold due to a strike in France. Hang in there Wisconsin 14!)
All my love, Mwah!, ...
But I am sticking with it regardless.
My sweetie loves Pinot Noir. It is her favorite red variety. I would much rather have Cab, Merlot or a Bordeaux blend. She loves sparkling wine, and I do, too, but I have no palate for it. She is much better at expressing what she is tasting than I am when it comes to bubbles.
![]() |
| 2007 Radio Coteau Nebblina |
With the exception of Kent Rasmussen's Ramsay North Coast Pinot Noir ($16-17) I have yet to find a reliable vintage in and vintage out under twenty dollar California Pinot Noir.
And then there is the other problem: California Pinot Noir at the over twenty dollar range is invariably way too hot and way way way too over-oaked, tasting burnt.
My customers love LaCrema ($19) but I cannot stand it. All you taste is barrel. There is no fruit, at all.
![]() |
| More Spring Mountain fruit, my fave Norcal appellation. This is Keenan 2006 Mernet, the wine we enjoyed on Oscar night. |
So, it was wonderful to see her bring home more Radio Coteau last night, a 2007! It was a wonderful present. Thanks, sweetie! It was gone rather too quickly (but we have a 2008, warming up in the bullpen.) I have discussed Radio Coteau in this space before but let me remind you that although not really Burgundian in style (frick, everyone here in Cali claims that they are Burgundian in style and none of them are. They do not have the soil, damnitt. Ugh.) Radio Coteau is one of the finest Cali Pinot Noirs evah!
Guess how much it costs? Fifty frickin dollars! (and worth every penny, honestly, it is a magical wine) and the one we've been drinking, the Nebblina, is Radio Coteau's entry-level wine!
That is what it is like drinking Pinot Noir in California. Ugh. Get me a glass of Stephen Vincent Merlot, please ($11.)
Of course if you live in France it is a whole different story. Those amazing Burgundies are dirt cheap there.
(Even accounting for the dock strikes. I love France. All of the US, waiting patiently for the 2010 Roses to sell. They are all on hold due to a strike in France. Hang in there Wisconsin 14!)
All my love, Mwah!, ...
Mar 8, 2011
I have seen Harold and Maude
A gabillion times but I watched it tonight just to see what it looks like now and, more importantly, to see all the ways Rushmore stole from it.
And, boie, does Rushmore owe a serious debt to it. The cemetery scenes, the leather chair psychiatrist shots, the massive tree shots (in Rushmore Bill Murray pulls a branch off and the tree falls down), the Cat Stevens music, the "different" young man in love with an older woman, and of course, Wes Anderson stole Bud Cort's furtive glance in to the camera in The Life Aquatic straight from Harold, as well, etc, ...
But Harold and Maude has been an inverted bell curve with me. I was knocked out with the film years ago but started to hate it after that. (Perhaps that was just an idiosyncratic thing, a woman I loved was besotted with the film which made me hate it all the more, espec after we broke up.)
I watched Rushmore with a friend, really expecting him to love the film as I do. I thought it was right up his alley. He shrugged it off, did not get it, and that is okay. Meanwhile, it was then I started to notice all the Harold and Maude allusions. I watched Harold and Maude soon after that (this was around 2001) and enjoyed it but not nearly as much as I enjoyed it tonight.
I think Harold and Maude is aging v well, silently, alone in the cellar whilst everyone has written it off. Harold and Maude's anachronistic ways, it's most certainly set in the US and there are clues to spell that out, yet, that is no United States that I know (and what is up w/ Mum having an English accent?) This anachronistic style of writing, designing, and shooting is a tool in Wes Anderson's box, i.e. Rushmore's ambiguous time-setting.
There are serious flaws in Harold and Maude, though. The "falling in love" montage of scenes is poorly edited (Hal Ashby's strong point!) and v stilted to say the least.
Still, I loved it tonight. It is still not up there with my all-time cult films. Those would be This is Spinal Tap, Withnail and I, and In the Loop. But it is still v good and deserves a second look if you have not seen it in a while.
************
Saw Of Gods and Men yesterday. I loved it, loved it, but it is hard to recommend a movie that is two hours long and feels twice that. Of course it is glacially paced, it is a film about monks. Still, it was v moving and absolutely pitch perfect to its' real-life subject matter. It looks like old religious paintings, the compositions are meticulous and spot-on. The birthday scene with the Muslims is ebullient, the "Swan Lake" scene is earthquakingly moving and the way each monk has their own character perfectly spelled out and shown is quite beautiful.
I guess I am recommending it, after all.
Love you all, Mwah!, ...
![]() |
| What really makes this sequence golden is Cort's sheepish glance at his Mum after this direct look at the camera. |
But Harold and Maude has been an inverted bell curve with me. I was knocked out with the film years ago but started to hate it after that. (Perhaps that was just an idiosyncratic thing, a woman I loved was besotted with the film which made me hate it all the more, espec after we broke up.)
I watched Rushmore with a friend, really expecting him to love the film as I do. I thought it was right up his alley. He shrugged it off, did not get it, and that is okay. Meanwhile, it was then I started to notice all the Harold and Maude allusions. I watched Harold and Maude soon after that (this was around 2001) and enjoyed it but not nearly as much as I enjoyed it tonight.
I think Harold and Maude is aging v well, silently, alone in the cellar whilst everyone has written it off. Harold and Maude's anachronistic ways, it's most certainly set in the US and there are clues to spell that out, yet, that is no United States that I know (and what is up w/ Mum having an English accent?) This anachronistic style of writing, designing, and shooting is a tool in Wes Anderson's box, i.e. Rushmore's ambiguous time-setting.
There are serious flaws in Harold and Maude, though. The "falling in love" montage of scenes is poorly edited (Hal Ashby's strong point!) and v stilted to say the least.
Still, I loved it tonight. It is still not up there with my all-time cult films. Those would be This is Spinal Tap, Withnail and I, and In the Loop. But it is still v good and deserves a second look if you have not seen it in a while.
************
Saw Of Gods and Men yesterday. I loved it, loved it, but it is hard to recommend a movie that is two hours long and feels twice that. Of course it is glacially paced, it is a film about monks. Still, it was v moving and absolutely pitch perfect to its' real-life subject matter. It looks like old religious paintings, the compositions are meticulous and spot-on. The birthday scene with the Muslims is ebullient, the "Swan Lake" scene is earthquakingly moving and the way each monk has their own character perfectly spelled out and shown is quite beautiful.
I guess I am recommending it, after all.
Love you all, Mwah!, ...
Mar 2, 2011
This should be a giant free-for-all,
Bullet-pointed, mish mash.
First, Bonnie: thanks for your v kind comments recently. I love your blog, too, and have added it to my blogroll. And friends of fauxluxe should check out Ms McClellan's excellent poetry blog, as well.
First, Bonnie: thanks for your v kind comments recently. I love your blog, too, and have added it to my blogroll. And friends of fauxluxe should check out Ms McClellan's excellent poetry blog, as well.
![]() |
| This is the crap lackey that the Koch Bros have sent to make you think that Unions ruin our world |
- Renee's parents are from Wisconsin. Da from Oshkosh, Mum from Appleton. I talked to them recently about what is going on in Madison. Renee's Dad, Bob, seems to think that Walker, having got the budget through the state Assembly has the upper hand. He thinks the Dem Senators will cave and I was not exactly sure if he was joking or not but he indicated that he believed the GOP rumor that some of the Senators were coming back home in the dead of night on occasion. I do not believe that for a second. I think the Senators are firmly ensconced in Illinois. I also do not think that Walker and the Koch's have the upper hand at all. In fact, I see Walker in a world of hurt. Each passing day seems to bring a fresh new offense or idiocy to the fore. The big "ace" Walker holds now is the threat of thousands of layoffs. But does he really think that once the pink slips are issued that everyone will just pack up and go home? Or that the Wisconsin 14 will just give up and slink back towards Madison? That is stupid. If Walker goes through with his blackmail that will only inflame the workers' passion more; stiffen their resolve, not crush it.
- "Yeah, well, you know, we considered that." That Walker even considered planting troublemakers at the Madison rallies (which, considering these are Wisconsin folks, natch, have been some of the most polite political rallies in recent history) is reprehensible yet par for the course with Teabagging "public servants" like Governor Walker.
- Can we please stop with the "liberal media" canard. This past Sunday, there was one, count 'em, one member from the unions re this issue. It was a tea-party, John McCain love-fest, non-stop Ayn Rand-asshole celebration. "If we just let bidness do its' own bidness" (market solves all) thing, everything will be just fine.
- Natch, the Teabaggers' Astroturfing Overlords sent out their zit-wracked junior lackey to wail about the "lamestream media" and, fuck, I do not even remember whatever else that asshole said, ...
- Walker's Pink Slip Parade Party changes every day. It was last Friday. Then it was yesterday. Then today. Walker is in such a world of hurt. Yesterday a major Wisconsin GOP Senator met with a couple of the Wisconsin 14. This was portrayed by the TradMedia (and elite liberal blogs) as a concession, fail by the Dems. Wrong again! There was one of the Wisconsin 14 on Rachel Maddow. They are holding their ground, damnitt.
- You know the bastards are losing when they set unnecessary " rules" for behavior and time regulations at a state building like the capitol in Madison.
- Other ways you know we are winning: the Wisconsin state house and senate passed a bill outlawing prank calls like the one that bit Walker on his ass. (But not like Lila Rose's crapshit "pimp and hooker" stunts.) Plus, now the GOP reps are fining the Wisconsin 14 $100 a day that they do not show up for quorum. Sounds like a major fund raising event to me!
- Fox News last night used old aggro Sactown footage to spell out its' (lame and wrong) "Union folks are head busters" storyline. Oops. That got caught quick!
- I will close with a couple of quotes from Molly Ivins: "Although it is true that only about 20 percent of American workers are in unions, that 20 percent sets the standards across the board in salaries, benefits and working conditions. If you are making a decent salary in a non-union company, you owe that to the unions. One thing that corporations do not do is give out money out of the goodness of their hearts." and: Another major [Bob] Dole backer is Koch Industries ($245,000), now the country's second-largest family-owned industry, and the Koch brothers are among the wealthiest men in the world (estimated worth: $4.7 billion). Among other right-wing groups, the Koches support the libertarian Cato Institute and Citizens for a Sound Economy, which should be called Rich Guys for Big Bidness. CSE wants to phase out Medicare completely, and Dole's regulatory reform bill---the one that would effectively repeal most of our health, safety and environmental regulations---is straight out of the CSE playbook.
- Do not you get it, America? They want it all. All the wealth. All your pension, 401k, all of it. That is their MO.
Renee and I really want to see
The documentary, We Were Here. The only place it is playing, though, is the Castro Theater. I do not know if we are man enough to do that. I will not mind the anger and indignation. I will join the queens and hoot and holler and boo Reagan, Falwell, Robertson, and the rest of those fucking enemies of love. With relish. It is the tears I am wary of. The entire theater will be infused with such pain, loss, and sorrow. Still, it is a pain I feel I must confront and absorb. And I will.
On somewhat the same topic, last night I saw Stonewall Uprising and I have two things to discuss: first, I did not think the film was v good. I thought the filmmakers spent too much time setting the "riots" up. I understand that this was a film that spent some time on The American Experience and had to really really really spell out how awful and suicidal our culture made gays feel prior to Stonewall. Most straight society in this country even in 2011 have no clue what our gay/lesbian godparents went through. (Even now, many straights do not get it, still.) But for the filmmakers to make such an effort to describe the uprising in numerous details, incl using animation, and yet cram all of that in to the last twenty minutes was confusing and frustrating to this viewer.
The other thing I would like to talk about re Stonewall Uprising relates to Gus van Sant's, Milk. The reason that Milk is ultimately a failure to me, despite its' many virtues, is the opening title sequence. Van Sant opens his film with documentary footage of gays, hiding their faces, being turned out of gay clubs, arrested, etc, ... And that, for me, was by far, the most moving part of the picture.
Maurice Conchis from Fowles' novel, The Magus, states flatly that he stopped reading fiction ages ago. As awful as Conchis is, I am on the same boat re fiction and non-fiction. How can van Sant expect us to seriously consider his "story" (based on someone's real life) after submitting us to that kind of poignant, sorrowful, infuriating prologue? Sure, as a Major Hollywood Entertainment it satisfies (and the Oscar for Sean Penn was a swooning plum) but in terms of being a moving, serious statement about an unsung, great American's life it fails.
I am sticking to the Oscar winning documentary, The Times of Harvey Milk (1984). Seeing the real Diane Fienstein confront the press after the horror is much better than any Hollywood slow motion death scene.
And the good news is that The Times of Harvey Milk will be coming out on blu-ray from Criterion very soon.
************
(I know, I know) but I finally saw Grand Illusion. Jean Renoir may be the finest filmmaker ever. No one gets at the subtleties and nuances of real human life better than him. No one else understands how complicated life is and expresses that complexity better on film. Philosophers are constantly wrestling with paradoxes. It is their life. It is what we expect from them and pay them for. Renoir is the master of negative capability. (And I am using Keats' definition of the term, which I feel best defines this esoteric, pretentious sensibility.) He is able to show every side of the story in a refreshing, honest humanistic way that constantly uplifts the spirit and makes one thrilled to be alive. The most obvious tool he uses to achieve this is his revolutionary use of deep-focus. But it is those scripts and stories that constantly challenge me politically, make me walk in my enemies' shoes. And Renoir does it as if I am enjoying a meal at a three star Michelin restaurant. Genius. Yet nearly artless. The true master of panache by Ardent Henry's standard.
************
I had the delicious pleasure of enjoying Grand Illusion as part of TCMs 31 Days of Oscar. I also had the supreme treat of watching Amadeus on the day Renee got the job. So, even though she thinks Amadeus is an overwrought rococo creation, she was so busy celebrating real-time on her cell that I had the film at my leisure.
I have seen Amadeus innumerable times. I have always loved it. I loved it a week ago, too. The music is first rate, natch. F Murray Abraham deserved his Oscar. Tom Hulce is brill. (What is he doing now?) Cynthia Nixon is so young, so vulnerable. Simon Callow was such a good sport and is still so good. The vaudeville scenes are treasures, making an olde theatre boie (like myself) hurt.
But the reason I love this film so much is that like the seminal Masterpiece Theater series, I, Claudius, Amadeus makes you feel as if you were there, that life really has not changed that fucking much in all the years that have passed. You can take your iPads, iPods, MacMinis, Kabletown, teevees, and all the rest, and really we are all still the same. We are still hearts beating, arms reaching, theater-going, book-reading, elated, (sometimes) sorrowful souls walking the pavements which have not much changed.
As wonderful as Amadeus is, my favorite Forman film will always be Loves of a Blonde. Amadeus was a prodigal son story. Forman returns to Czechoslovakia and turns Prague in to Vienna. Loves of a Blonde was shot by the same man as Amadeus. Loves of a Blonde captures the mittel-european sense of humor better than any film I have seen. (Still fucking waiting for the US release of Cristian Mungiu's, Tales of the Golden Age.) And the scene where the kids flood the dance hall will live with me forever.
Loves of a Blonde is like the Stones' song, Factory Girl. But a lot better.
But right around the time I was born (and MLK was assassinated) the Soviet tanks rolled in to Prague and the Czech New Wave was dead. Forman ran off to New York (good for him) and made films like One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Hair, and Amadeus. His return to Prague was seen as a major triumph and this was before Havel's Velvet Revolution.
************
There is more to come: discussions on The Pink Floyd, Giant Sand, and the Wisconsin situation. I love you all, Mwah!, ...
On somewhat the same topic, last night I saw Stonewall Uprising and I have two things to discuss: first, I did not think the film was v good. I thought the filmmakers spent too much time setting the "riots" up. I understand that this was a film that spent some time on The American Experience and had to really really really spell out how awful and suicidal our culture made gays feel prior to Stonewall. Most straight society in this country even in 2011 have no clue what our gay/lesbian godparents went through. (Even now, many straights do not get it, still.) But for the filmmakers to make such an effort to describe the uprising in numerous details, incl using animation, and yet cram all of that in to the last twenty minutes was confusing and frustrating to this viewer.
The other thing I would like to talk about re Stonewall Uprising relates to Gus van Sant's, Milk. The reason that Milk is ultimately a failure to me, despite its' many virtues, is the opening title sequence. Van Sant opens his film with documentary footage of gays, hiding their faces, being turned out of gay clubs, arrested, etc, ... And that, for me, was by far, the most moving part of the picture.
Maurice Conchis from Fowles' novel, The Magus, states flatly that he stopped reading fiction ages ago. As awful as Conchis is, I am on the same boat re fiction and non-fiction. How can van Sant expect us to seriously consider his "story" (based on someone's real life) after submitting us to that kind of poignant, sorrowful, infuriating prologue? Sure, as a Major Hollywood Entertainment it satisfies (and the Oscar for Sean Penn was a swooning plum) but in terms of being a moving, serious statement about an unsung, great American's life it fails.
I am sticking to the Oscar winning documentary, The Times of Harvey Milk (1984). Seeing the real Diane Fienstein confront the press after the horror is much better than any Hollywood slow motion death scene.
And the good news is that The Times of Harvey Milk will be coming out on blu-ray from Criterion very soon.
************
(I know, I know) but I finally saw Grand Illusion. Jean Renoir may be the finest filmmaker ever. No one gets at the subtleties and nuances of real human life better than him. No one else understands how complicated life is and expresses that complexity better on film. Philosophers are constantly wrestling with paradoxes. It is their life. It is what we expect from them and pay them for. Renoir is the master of negative capability. (And I am using Keats' definition of the term, which I feel best defines this esoteric, pretentious sensibility.) He is able to show every side of the story in a refreshing, honest humanistic way that constantly uplifts the spirit and makes one thrilled to be alive. The most obvious tool he uses to achieve this is his revolutionary use of deep-focus. But it is those scripts and stories that constantly challenge me politically, make me walk in my enemies' shoes. And Renoir does it as if I am enjoying a meal at a three star Michelin restaurant. Genius. Yet nearly artless. The true master of panache by Ardent Henry's standard.
************
I had the delicious pleasure of enjoying Grand Illusion as part of TCMs 31 Days of Oscar. I also had the supreme treat of watching Amadeus on the day Renee got the job. So, even though she thinks Amadeus is an overwrought rococo creation, she was so busy celebrating real-time on her cell that I had the film at my leisure.
I have seen Amadeus innumerable times. I have always loved it. I loved it a week ago, too. The music is first rate, natch. F Murray Abraham deserved his Oscar. Tom Hulce is brill. (What is he doing now?) Cynthia Nixon is so young, so vulnerable. Simon Callow was such a good sport and is still so good. The vaudeville scenes are treasures, making an olde theatre boie (like myself) hurt.
But the reason I love this film so much is that like the seminal Masterpiece Theater series, I, Claudius, Amadeus makes you feel as if you were there, that life really has not changed that fucking much in all the years that have passed. You can take your iPads, iPods, MacMinis, Kabletown, teevees, and all the rest, and really we are all still the same. We are still hearts beating, arms reaching, theater-going, book-reading, elated, (sometimes) sorrowful souls walking the pavements which have not much changed.
As wonderful as Amadeus is, my favorite Forman film will always be Loves of a Blonde. Amadeus was a prodigal son story. Forman returns to Czechoslovakia and turns Prague in to Vienna. Loves of a Blonde was shot by the same man as Amadeus. Loves of a Blonde captures the mittel-european sense of humor better than any film I have seen. (Still fucking waiting for the US release of Cristian Mungiu's, Tales of the Golden Age.) And the scene where the kids flood the dance hall will live with me forever.
Loves of a Blonde is like the Stones' song, Factory Girl. But a lot better.
![]() |
| City boy meets factory girl in Loves of a Blonde |
But right around the time I was born (and MLK was assassinated) the Soviet tanks rolled in to Prague and the Czech New Wave was dead. Forman ran off to New York (good for him) and made films like One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Hair, and Amadeus. His return to Prague was seen as a major triumph and this was before Havel's Velvet Revolution.
************
There is more to come: discussions on The Pink Floyd, Giant Sand, and the Wisconsin situation. I love you all, Mwah!, ...
Feb 23, 2011
Feb 21, 2011
As most of my friend-lies
Already know, I take after my Irish-Italian Grandmother and do not drive. I have never even owned a drivers' license and I suspect I never will own a drivers' license.
(I know, I know: it is a miracle that I have been able to date any woman, much less be engaged to one.)
Since just about every wine trade tasting is in the City and since most of those tastings in the City are in Fort Mason, which Tre Bicchieri was, natch, that meant I would have to do BART, cabs, MUNI, the whole deal.
I have not hailed many cabs and every time I am called upon to do it I get a little scared. It seems like such an adult ritual or gesture and in many ways (e.g. not driving!, etc, ... ) I am certainly not an adult. I hailed two cabs in the City that day (the first was kind of a cheat, I did it right in front of the St Francis Hotel) and by the time I was nestled in my BART car, whooshing home after a v long day, I was happy to note that I had conquered my cab-hailing fears. In fact, I loved hailing cabs. I want to go right back to the City as soon as I can and hail a bunch more. But that will have to wait.
Enough with the prologue, our story begins here:
Renee and I received a letter from PG&E that our power would be turned off at around nine a.m. that morning due to some work being done on our cross street. (Turns out our power was not turned off; we were not affected by the work being done.) That meant that I would have to leave a little bit earlier than necessary to make my first destination and I would prob have some time to kill. Me being the old, non-driving, public transport, time killing pro that I am (for those of us who do not drive, time killing is a discipline that must be mastered and let it be known that I am a black belt time killer) I knew that the smartest plan was to get to the original destination first, so there is no chance of my being late, for sure, and I would not be rushed or overcome with anxiety, having to get to my destination at the last minute. Essentially, it is better to kill time closer to your destination than farther away.
(You can always tell the folks that take public transport: they are the ones standing alone, reading or smoking, in front of the meeting place. It is the folks that drive who are always late.)
Anyhoo, my game plan was to take a County Connection bus (the #7) to Walnut Creek BART and then take the SFO/Millbrae line to the Powell Street station. From there I would hail a cab to 2300 Chestnut in the Marina, my first destination, Ristobar, where Young's Market was hosting a pre-tasting event. I decided that I would wing it after Ristobar.
When I went out to catch my bus at 8:50 a.m. it was cold and raining. Not a good omen for the day ahead. It was not the normal No. California type of Winter rain, either. It was coming down fairly hard, fairly sideways. I chose not to plug in to my iPod but instead tried to read my small book, Sontag & Kael, Opposites Attract Me by Craig Seligman. One woman ran to my side at the sheltered bus stop right before the bus arrived.
I bought an eight dollar BART ticket at Walnut Creek and boarded my train. Luckily, I did not have to stand. There were a few seats available. I sidled up next to a woman who proceeded to curl her small body as close to the window and as far as possible away from me as she could. At either the Lafayette or Orinda stop a petite woman boarded and sat across from me in the aisle. She had a horsey face but exquisite stockings and super shiny black pumps. She got off at Embarcadero, the first stop in the City.
A couple of stops later I alighted on to Market and Powell streets. Looks like the BART fares have gone up. I looked at my ticket and realized I would have to add to my ticket for my return trip. Like I always do when traveling, I sized up the situation and asked myself, "Can I walk to my destination?" The answer to that question was, "Yes, I could make it in time," but I did not have the energy to attack those hills right then. Plus, I wanted to hail a cab, tell the driver, "The Marina, please, and step on it."
I walked up Powell St, on the look out for taxis heading west. The rain clouds had vanished. It was sunny and if not warm, it was not cold. Right in front of the St Francis Hotel I saw a cab pull up. I raised my right arm, got the driver's attention and felt like Cary Grant as I slid in to the back seat, "The Marina, please," I said, "Twenty three hundred Chestnut, and step on it!" I am kidding, I did not say, "Step on it."
That took about ten minutes and cost me about twelve dollars. I knew it would be no problem killing time there. Ristobar is across the street from one of my all-time fave restaurants, A16. I knew there would not be a bunch of cool bookstores (bookstores are the professional time killers' valhalla) but there would be breakfast places, coffee shops, overpriced boutiques, whathaveyou, ...
Sure enough, I arrived about an hour and a half before the pre-tasting event. There was a Starbuck's, natch, and a Peet's. I hate coffee shops and I do not much like coffee. I prefer bar culture, as messy, and loud, and as ugly as it can get, over coffee shop culture any day of the week. I noticed there was a funky breakfast/lunch cafe called The Grove. I decided to eat there. It is a counter restaurant. You order your food at a counter, get a "flag" to signify your order, and someone brings your order to you and takes your "flag" back home. I ordered the basic jack & cheddar omelet, which comes with hash browns and their "special" thick-cut toast.
The place is not that great. It is like an over-blown coffee shop. Everyone had their Macs plugged in to special outlets or they were reading on their iPads instead. The omelet was okay, the hash browns had rosemary in them (weird) and the toast was barely buttered and lame. But their iced tea was v good. I had two of those, read my book, and watched the Macintosh-folks do their hip Marina/Fillmore thing.
I went down a side street and had a cigarette, came back up towards Ristobar and noticed folks setting up for the event. There were men in suits on cell-phones, standing in front of Ristobar. These guys were from Young's Market, you could tell. I crossed the street to check out the A16 lunch menu. A16 runs my favorite wine program in the Bay Area. Shelly Lindgren only pours southern Italian wines there. No Brunello, Chianti, or Barolo there. In honor of Tre Bicchieri her list for that day was only wines that would be poured at Tre Bicchieri later.
I bumped in to one of my old reps, Stefano. He did not remember me. But he was polite. Later, I learned that he does not work for Young's Market anymore and runs his own Italian wine import business. Some of the wines he reps had made Tre Bicchieri and were poured at the event at Fort Mason.
Noon came around and I went to the pre-tasting event. I hated it. I thought it was going to be a much smaller, more exclusive, little lunch-y type of thing. It was the normal over-crowded trade tasting that makes folks like me hate trade tastings. The retail folks like myself were heavily out-numbered by the wholesale, Young's folks, which made me look pathetically under-dressed. (I wore black Jack Purcell trainers; black socks with pink skull and crossbones on them; my supersmart, sexy Gap 1969 brown cords; an undershirt; a red button down shirt; and (the big crime) my Stax hoodie. No one gave a shit at the actual event but at this Young's Market thing-y, I definitely got some looks and frowns. Fuck 'em.)
(I know, I know: wine trade tastings sound like they are a lot of fun to folks outside the industry but they are not. There is a lot of shoving, jostling for position, and pretentious posturing at the producer's table. Plus, many folks treat it like a fucking mixer and get horribly loaded and start leering at prospective "dates.")
It was near impossible to try the wines at Ristobar. The Young's folks did a lot of back-slapping and celebrating, happy their event seemed such a hit. But was it? It seemed like it was just a lot of grey and blue suited Young's reps doing a victory lap and then preaching to the choir.
Still, it was nice to see some Young's folks: Sean (who used to be a Whole Foods wine buyer), Mark G., and Erin, who got me my ticket to Tre Bicchieri. (Thanks.)
But now it was time to go to the real event, at last. I raised my right hand and hailed a westbound taxi on Chestnut, "Take me to Fort Mason, please." The driver laughed and I asked why. He said he had just taken a cabful of Italian folks there. I told him there was a big wine-tasting event. As we pulled in to Fort Mason it was my turn to laugh. He asked, "What's so funny?" "I coulda walked," I said as I settled the fare and headed towards Tre Bicchieri 2011.
Of course, I was early. I took my place in the queue, got my ticket ready, and people-watched. Even if there was not a queue it was v easy to tell the wine producers from the retail tradesfolk. The producers were ninety per cent men, wearing fabulous silk or wool suits with amazing Italian shoes. The producers spoke Italian, natch, most of the time on to their cell phones, and smoked furiously whilst doing so.
The tradesfolk did not smoke, wore trainers, cords, and jeans; hoodies, windcheaters, and jumpers. They took lots of pictures with their cell phones.
I am v glad I got there early. Angelo from Vinity greeted me as I walked in, got my program and my cool Tre Bicchieri neck bag (to hold your glass in if you need to free your hands for anything.) Angelo was giving away complimentary 100 mil bottles of grappa. Hello!
The other good thing about getting there early was I could hit all my friends' tables without having to fight anyone for a taste or a chance to spit. (Yes, folks, I spat the entire time until I knew I was going to leave.)
I was most impressed by the white wines I tasted. There was a Barolo I particularly liked, Ettore Germano Barolo Cerretta '06, and a Nero d'Avola that is a bit pricey, Firriato Harmonium '08, but it was the whites that shone brightest.
I tried Sassacaia ('07) and Cabreo just because I had not tasted them in a while but I was not impressed. I stayed away from the super-tuscans, the blockbuster cab/merlot/sangiovese blends that earn all the points and cost a mint. When I first got in to the "industry", I loved those wines but I would much rather have a reasonably priced Nero d'Avola or Montepulciano d'Abruzzo these days. They are much better with good food.
Here are the whites that I absolutely loved: Cantina Produttori San Michele Appiano A.A. Sauvignon St. Valentin '09 (I sell at my store the same producer's Pinot Grigio and Pinot Bianco); Elena Walch A.A Gewurztraminer Kastelaz '09; Sergio Mottura Grechetto Poggio della Costa '09; Cantine Lunae Bosoni Colli di Luni Vermentino Lunae Et. Nera '09.
The thing about these great white wines, and there were others that are not leaping straight to my mind as I write now, was how crisp and refreshing they were. The are all perfect for seafood, natch, (which I do not particularly care for) but they are so lively, unfussy, and fun. They are total porch-sipping wines. The acidity is such that they encourage you to drink more. They are not heavy, high-alcohol wines that weigh like a ton of bricks on you, like a Napa Chard. They are elegant yet spirited. Mischievous and classy, all at the same time. They are like the super smart tom boy sister at the wedding, running amok and amongst the stuffy, overdressed, overbearing, blowhard Uncles (that would be the Sassacaias and Cabreos, the super-tuscans.) Those whites were a breath of fresh air at this event.
I saw Tom, Julian, Raphael, and got to meet the guy who runs the wine program at Postino, a v nice restaurant in my neck of the woods, Lafayette.
Julian and I tried a v pricey but lovely Prosecco from a v small hill that is part of the new DOCG Prosecco classification. And then I decided it was time to go home.
And who woulda thunk it? The best part of my whole day was the trip home.
![]() |
| Saint Etienne lounge at home |
MUNI drivers are notorious for being cranky bastards. I was considering hailing another cab to take me to the Powell St station but I bumped in to this lovely, v good-looking British couple who had just been to Tre Bicchieri themselves, still wearing their neck bags, who were talking a v sweet MUNI driver about the best way to get downtown. We all boarded his MUNI and got transfer tickets and he told us where to get off so as to make it home. We were to board the 30 Stockton. The MUNI stop was barely a "stop" at all, it was an unsheltered street corner with yellow paint on the street light the only thing indicating that we were at a "stop".
We did not have long to wait. This MUNI driver was cranky. I offered him my transfer ticket and he waved me in disgustedly. Ah, now that is more like it. Though busy, once again I was able to sit down. I sat down in the second half of the train, right behind the back side exit. I had the seat to myself until a business man sat next to me. I finally pulled out my iPod and started to listening to Saint Etienne.
Saint Etienne are a fab group whenever but their music, especially their 4/4 discotheque songs are perfect for taveling by train, car, whathaveyou. The trip was beautiful if a little on the long side. After the Marina we did North Beach and passed right by the Italian restaurant that I went to with Dawn Walter the night the 'Niners won the Super Bowl and the City went ballistic. Then suddenly we were going through Chinatown and all the crowds at the vendors' tables were four of five people thick, the City hopping and electric on a regular Wednesday early evening.
I got to Powell, added on to my ticket and boarded another v busy train. Once again I was able to sit down, miraculously. The woman beside me was thumbing through a Martha Stewart Good Food magazine, then she started revisiting a hand-written letter in a notebook, then started reading a glossy pink novel, and then she finally went to sleep. The woman in front of me was reading a Virginia Woolf novel on her kindle.
Saint Etienne kept pumping along. Stoned to Say the Least, Urban Clearway, Hug My Soul, Like a Motorway, Cool Kids of Death. Glorious.
I arrived back at Walnut Creek and began my walk home. I tried unsuccessfully to break in to my bottle of grappa. As I made the turn at the bottom of The Hill and Cool Kids of Death kicked in nice and loud I noticed that I was walking up the hill I was walking straight towards the full moon. It was as if I was walking a ramp that would take me straight to the moon itself. Magical.
Here is the playlist for my travels home (all tracks by Saint Etienne):
1. London Belongs to Me
2. Kiss and Make Up
3. Primrose Hill
4. Mario's Cafe
5. Railway Jam
6. You're in a Bad Way
7. Memo to Pricey
8. Hobart Paving
9. Here Come the Clown Feet
10. Urban Clearway
11. Chicken Soup
12. Join Our Club
13. Hug My Soul
14. Former Lover
15. Like a Motorway
16. On the Shore
17. Marble Lions
18. Cool Kids of Death
19. I Was Born on Christmas Day
I love you all, mwah!
Feb 19, 2011
Feb 17, 2011
Pretty cool to see what is
Happening in Madison, WI these past few days. Teachers are calling out "sick", forcing schools to shut down; protesters have been occupying the state house; and the entire Democratic Senate caucus has left town, actually the state, meaning there can be no vote on the newly elected idiotic Republican Governor's Union-busting bill. Even some of the World Champion Green Bay Packers have come out against this stupid bill, citing that the Packers are the only publicly-owned NFL team. Good for all those folks.
Governor Walker is in a tizzy now. He's called out the state police to find these Senators. One of the first things Walker did upon taking office was to nix the Fed money for high-speed rail. Smart. The Feds told him if you say no to the new program you cannot use the money for something else. The money would be shared with the states that want high-speed rail. Well, now the new Republican goofball Governor of Florida says he don't want no money for high-speed rail, either. He wants to use the money for highways. Cannot do that, guy. Sweet. It means that us folks in California, who do want high-speed rail, and all the jobs and environmental benefits that it brings to our fair state, will get even more money.
************
Bernie Sanders, I love you. He may be the last true US public servant we will ever see. This was posted by digby today. It is a long interview for blogging standards but you really should read the whole thing. I am going to say it one more time: There is nothing wrong with Social Security. It is fully-funded until 2037. Plus, Social Security has absolutely nothing to do with the deficit, and lastly, those that you hear who are complaining the loudest about a "bankrupt" Social Security are those that want to destroy Social Security. Do not listen to them. They are evil and they are wrong.
Bernie was so magnificent in the interview. He hit on just about every single issue progressives need to concentrate on in the future and did not pull any punches re the crappy Bush tax-cut extensions. Love that guy!
************
Meanwhile, there was this cool miniseries I saw on PBS back in the mid-nineties (I did not have Kabletown back then) called Shut Down! It starred Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton in a stupid political struggle that really did no one any good. In fact, it only pissed Americans off and embarrassed the GOP.
It appears that golf-loving, tanning salon aficionado, Boehner (along with his new Teabagging buddies) wanta do a remake. Whatever. I know how the thing ends.
Some folks just never learn.
************
Saturday, this space: Tre Bicchieri!
![]() |
| They ain't celebrating the Packers' Super Bowl win, they're standing up to Union-busters! |
************
Bernie Sanders, I love you. He may be the last true US public servant we will ever see. This was posted by digby today. It is a long interview for blogging standards but you really should read the whole thing. I am going to say it one more time: There is nothing wrong with Social Security. It is fully-funded until 2037. Plus, Social Security has absolutely nothing to do with the deficit, and lastly, those that you hear who are complaining the loudest about a "bankrupt" Social Security are those that want to destroy Social Security. Do not listen to them. They are evil and they are wrong.
Bernie was so magnificent in the interview. He hit on just about every single issue progressives need to concentrate on in the future and did not pull any punches re the crappy Bush tax-cut extensions. Love that guy!
************
Meanwhile, there was this cool miniseries I saw on PBS back in the mid-nineties (I did not have Kabletown back then) called Shut Down! It starred Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton in a stupid political struggle that really did no one any good. In fact, it only pissed Americans off and embarrassed the GOP.
It appears that golf-loving, tanning salon aficionado, Boehner (along with his new Teabagging buddies) wanta do a remake. Whatever. I know how the thing ends.
Some folks just never learn.
************
Saturday, this space: Tre Bicchieri!
Feb 14, 2011
Leah Garchik's,
Again, words of love on Valentine's is a lovely little Cognac Truffle in the SFChronicle today. The Chron Datebook section remains golden.
(And Jon Carroll's column today was excellent, as well.)
(And Jon Carroll's column today was excellent, as well.)
Feb 13, 2011
I liked the movie,
![]() |
| These stars have rough lives. |
************
SO, ... right smack-dab in the middle of Black History Month, as some of you might have already heard, but I am going to talk about it anyway because it makes me frickin' ill, The Mississippi Division of Sons of Confederate Veterans are proposing the state honor Nathan Bedford Forrest with a commemorative license plate.
![]() |
| Forrest, the "entrepreneur." |
You know, it is the usual tired, pathetic arguments: "The Civil War was not really about slavery"; "The North was/is racist, too" (Yeah, no shit, Sherlock); and, "Sure, Forrest was an asshole but what a brilliant tactician he was!"
Nathan Bedford Forrest does not deserve to have a landfill named after him.
I am done. I feel like I need to cleanse myself. I am going to watch some Watts/Stax, listen to Booker T. and the M.G.s all day.
Love you all.
Feb 10, 2011
Life is fantastic here
Right now in Walnut Creek. Work was fine, the walk home propulsed by Squeeze on the iPod and loosened up by a cheap, v small cava. I arrived home, made pasta and watched An American in Paris on TCM. (Still on! as of 8:14 pm PST.)
(And I love you, David Thomson. You introduced me to Belle de Jour, Simone Signoret, L'atalante, Sunrise, Jean-Pierre Melville and much more but you are totally off-base when you state that The Band Wagon is the best Freed Unit musical. So wrong. Singin' in the Rain is the best and An American in Paris next. Meet Me in St Louis is better than The Band Wagon, too. Anyhoo,)
There will be no baseball talk tonight. I am hunkering down and going scattershot o'er a number of topics, mostly films.
And it begins thusly,
xxxxxxxxxx
(And I love you, David Thomson. You introduced me to Belle de Jour, Simone Signoret, L'atalante, Sunrise, Jean-Pierre Melville and much more but you are totally off-base when you state that The Band Wagon is the best Freed Unit musical. So wrong. Singin' in the Rain is the best and An American in Paris next. Meet Me in St Louis is better than The Band Wagon, too. Anyhoo,)
There will be no baseball talk tonight. I am hunkering down and going scattershot o'er a number of topics, mostly films.
And it begins thusly,
![]() |
| This is a sandwich named after my Sweetie. |
- So, I am reading the current Hollywood edition of Vanity Fair on a break today. Naturally there is a gorgeous photograph and brief discussion of Ms Portman, who may beat out Ms Bening (an injustice in my eyes) for Best Actress two and a half weeks from now. This discussion mentions that there is a "all you can eat" sex scene between Ms Portman and Ms Kunis in Black Swan. I have a few things to say about this revelation: First, let me quote "Fosse's" daughter in All That Jazz, "To me, lesbian scenes are a real turn-off,"; and, second, I will always prefer Sarandon and Deneuve in The Hunger; lastly, I will stick to the Archers' The Red Shoes, thank you v much.
- Speaking of Vanity Fair, (Graydon Carter was the co-founder and Editor of Spy magazine but is now Editor-in-Chief of Vanity Fair, which has lots of little Spy tricks and sidebars, gimmicks, etc, ... [incl in this current issue a "Create Your Own Oscar Film" page/chart,] as I was perusing my latest Spy back-issue, July 1989, I noticed a couple of mentions and realized that The cast never changes. Both of them were in the William F Buckley article, as in who would be his heir. In the Ayn Rand sidebar they mention Miss America 1988, Gretchen Carlson, as being a big fan of Ms Rand and The Fountainhead. Of course, Ms Carlson is now co-host of perhaps Fox News' most heinous program, Fox & Friends. The other mention was this quote re Ben Hart: " 'The neoliberals used to say that the scandal isn't what's illegal,' ventures Malcolm Gladwell, a Washington Post reporter and former American Spectator writer."
- And speaking of the July '89 issue of Spy, I checked out cover star, Emily Lloyd's debut and break out picture, Wish You Were Here. It is damn good but not like the preview which I watched, as well. The preview makes Wish You Were Here out to be more like Monella by Tinto Brass than what the film is really like. It is actually a v serious little film about what it is like to be a sexually liberated woman in late '40s England. Ms Lloyd is fantastic and it is a shame that her mental health problems derailed what could have been a v fine career. Ms Lloyd was supposed to play the Mandy Rice-Davies role in Scandal, too. It stinks that that did not work out. She would have been much better than Bridget Fonda (and her awful English accent.) Tom Bell, from Prime Suspect, stars also. Wish You Were Here is v good.
- Interlude: my pasta came out v well, farfalle and red sauce, one of my best sauces.
- It hurt to see Fabio go out last night. They shoulda sent Tiffany packing. Great to see Carla win, though.
- I really liked Winter's Bone despite Jennifer Lawrence's ho hum performance. You can tell v early on she does not have the stuff to carry a movie on her own. My example would be the first scene she shares with Thump's "ladyfriend". Ms Lawrence is not nearly tough enough to stand up to her when the script is telling all of us she is. It is a stilted, eye-rolling sequence that hopefully Ms Lawrence will nail going forward. What makes Winter's Bone good (but not great) is the script. I love the early Odyssey sequence of Ms Lawrence having to hit each holler, speaking to folks that would rather kill her than speak to her, each holler revealing a more sinister, more formidable foe. But the thing that really cinches Winter's Bone to me is the language. As the script is based on a novel, I am assuming that much of the language/dialogue is lifted straight from the book. The dialogue reminds me of the novel, Warlock. It is formal, polite and v elevated. I love it. I imagine I will be talking like those hill people meth-addicts for a while now. I asked my Mum, who lived in a holler in Arkansas for a few years if folks talked like that. She said, No. But where she lived, Eureka Springs, is a tourist town, full of hippie artist types and rich folks. I really want to read the novel. I thought John Hawkes' performance was especially rich and chewy. He was the big stand-out to me, along with Lauren Sweetser and Dale Dickey.
- I have always loved the film, The Sweet Hereafter. (Thanks, Mo.) One day, a friend and I were riding BART together. He had a lot of time on his hands, I suppose, I cannot remember exactly, but he went to the Albany theater to watch Felicia's Journey and I went home. Later I asked him what he thought of Felicia's Journey, director Atom Egoyan's follow up to The Sweet Hereafter. He hated it. I forgot about it andthereyouhaveit, except, ... For whatever reason (maybe because they both have contemporary English stars?) I have always confused Felicia's Journey with another film that came out around the same time. And in my confusion I have always avoided a film that I should have watched years ago, simply because my friend said Felicia's Journey stunk. That film is Sexy Beast. Sexy Beast is just like its' title. It is a sexy, violent, surreal, nightmarish fucking masterful film that I am kicking myself now for not having seen until two nights ago. Uh, when you see Ben Kingsley (nominated for best-supporting actor) on the screen you are riveted. The airplane scene is one for all-time, up there with the Five Easy Pieces diner scene. And the airport security interrogation scene with Kingsley might be even better. Kingsley is just un-worldly, alien-like, and like a car wreck in the sense that despite your guilt or misgivings or dread of rubbernecking, you cannot turn away. You have to watch him. But there is so much more to like about aboot this mesmerizing picture. The brill score, the boulder scene early on, the performances by Ray Winstone; Ian McShane (my gawd, he is good); Amanda Redman; and Julianne White, my goodness, this is a film I will own. A v different, mind you, British gangster film that deserves a spot next to John Mackenzie's also brill The Long Good Friday on my shelf. Fucking fantastic, other-worldly picture.
![]() |
| Daddy and Mavis, 2/9/11. |
Feb 9, 2011
Not really torn anymore re
Michael Young being traded. That is because of stuff like this, or stuff like this. Michael Young, the "Face of the franchise" is a baseball player. He is a pretty good player, not as good as he used to be and mos def not a great defensive player. He is payed $16 million a year to play for the Texas Rangers. He has 3 years left on his current guaranteed contract with the ballclub. "Face" does not wanta be a DH. "Face" wants to play in the field. "Face" is no longer an asset to the club with his glove. All that saw his ole moves in game one of the past World Serious can attest to that statement. "Face" has whined every single time he has been moved around the infield but because he always eventually shut up and just played, the DFW and national media have lauded "Face" as a trouper, a real stand-up, unselfish guy. I am not buying that anymore. Actually, I never really drank that kool-aid to begin with but it was positive press for my joke of a franchise so I just went with it, reluctantly. Another thing "Face" liked to whine about was how the Rangers never won anything, how the Front Office did not seem even invested in producing a winning ballclub. Guess the frick what? After a v rocky start (incl this ridiculous long term contract for "Face"), Ranger GM, Jon Daniels, went on an amazing Bob le Flambeur winning streak. He acquired current AL MVP, Josh Hamilton, in a trade. He hoodwinked the Atlanta Braves, getting Elvis Andrus; current Rookie of the Year, Neftali Feliz; swingman, Matt Harrison; and a couple of players still in the pipeline, all for Mark Teixiera, who plays for the Damn Yankees now. He unloaded Gagne for Dave Murphy. CJ Wilson moved from set-up man to a good #2 or #3 starter and he rescued Colby Lewis from Japan, v cheaply, I might add. Colby Lewis has the only Ranger World Serious victory in its' wretched history. To top it all, last year Daniels hoodwinked the Damn Yankees and got Cliff Lee for the stretch-run and playoffs. You know the rest. The Rangers won their first pennant and lost to the SF Giants in the World Serious.
So, now $16 million per annum and a winning ballclub are not enough for "Face." For crying out loud, he is going to get his 600 PAs (plate appearances). Kinsler, Cruz, and Hamilton are seriously injury prone and our first base option is a rook, who the jury is still out on. (Not me, though, I think Mitch Moreland is gonna be a stud.) "Face" can spell Beltre at third, Andrus at short, and Kinsler at second. Plus there was talk he would learn first. He could spell Moreland if he washes out. If "Face" just apologizes and takes one for the team (whilst earning sixteen million dollars playing a game) the Rangers would have one of the deepest and best lineups in the Majors.
And "Face" is essentially holding the team hostage. Sometime in late May or early June of this year "Face" becomes 10 and 5. 10 and 5 is a Union incentive meaning a Major League ballplayer has played ten years in the Show, five with one ballclub. 10 and 5 means "Face" cannot be traded to any team, for anything unless "Face" agrees to it.
(Do not get me wrong: owners are swine. They always have been and they always will be. Watch the totally brill Eight Men Out, dir by big Union man (Matewan!), John Sayles to get the flavor of how horribly Major League ballplayers were treated back then. If you were not a star it was basically indentured servitude, the club could bury you in the minors indefinitely or trade you to whomever for whatever the club desired. If you were not a star your salary sucked and if you did not agree to terms with the club [and most contracts back then were renegotiated every single season] then you did not PLAY, i.e. WORK. Back to the zinc mines for you, loser. I ALWAYS take the Union's side in these labor disputes. I do not care HOW much these players make today. They are just signing contracts that evil owners put in front of them!)
No team in baseball, as much as they would like to have "Face" on their team (and there are teams that would like to own "Face") wants to pay the rest of his contract. The Rangers are over a barrel in more ways than one.
Michael, please. Say you are sorry. We will get a TORP at the deadline and go to the playoffs again. And who knows what happens then? You are paid (in baseball terms) twice what you are worth. In real-life terms I cannot even do the math on how overpaid you are.
Let's win the whole deal, dude. Say you are sorry.
************
This "Face" thing ran oot of control (and no one is gonna read this post). Tomorrow: Clos Manou, Sexy Beast, Winter's Bone. I swear.
Love you all, ....
P.S. Puh-leeze, give me Joe Blanton for "Face."
So, now $16 million per annum and a winning ballclub are not enough for "Face." For crying out loud, he is going to get his 600 PAs (plate appearances). Kinsler, Cruz, and Hamilton are seriously injury prone and our first base option is a rook, who the jury is still out on. (Not me, though, I think Mitch Moreland is gonna be a stud.) "Face" can spell Beltre at third, Andrus at short, and Kinsler at second. Plus there was talk he would learn first. He could spell Moreland if he washes out. If "Face" just apologizes and takes one for the team (whilst earning sixteen million dollars playing a game) the Rangers would have one of the deepest and best lineups in the Majors.
And "Face" is essentially holding the team hostage. Sometime in late May or early June of this year "Face" becomes 10 and 5. 10 and 5 is a Union incentive meaning a Major League ballplayer has played ten years in the Show, five with one ballclub. 10 and 5 means "Face" cannot be traded to any team, for anything unless "Face" agrees to it.
(Do not get me wrong: owners are swine. They always have been and they always will be. Watch the totally brill Eight Men Out, dir by big Union man (Matewan!), John Sayles to get the flavor of how horribly Major League ballplayers were treated back then. If you were not a star it was basically indentured servitude, the club could bury you in the minors indefinitely or trade you to whomever for whatever the club desired. If you were not a star your salary sucked and if you did not agree to terms with the club [and most contracts back then were renegotiated every single season] then you did not PLAY, i.e. WORK. Back to the zinc mines for you, loser. I ALWAYS take the Union's side in these labor disputes. I do not care HOW much these players make today. They are just signing contracts that evil owners put in front of them!)
No team in baseball, as much as they would like to have "Face" on their team (and there are teams that would like to own "Face") wants to pay the rest of his contract. The Rangers are over a barrel in more ways than one.
Michael, please. Say you are sorry. We will get a TORP at the deadline and go to the playoffs again. And who knows what happens then? You are paid (in baseball terms) twice what you are worth. In real-life terms I cannot even do the math on how overpaid you are.
Let's win the whole deal, dude. Say you are sorry.
************
This "Face" thing ran oot of control (and no one is gonna read this post). Tomorrow: Clos Manou, Sexy Beast, Winter's Bone. I swear.
Love you all, ....
![]() |
| "Face" gets ready to rok the Royals. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











